Dealing with Bias and Fairness Issues in Computer Vision Systems 

Photo by Ion Feton Unsplash


The blogs have been written by the Revca team with the help of a countless interns that have also contributed to bringing these points to you.

Follow us on:

All too frequently, issues with bias and fairness in AI reach the news. Facial recognition, law enforcement, and healthcare are some of the most notorious problems, but we’ve witnessed mistakes where machine learning is causing some groups or individuals to be disadvantaged across numerous industries and applications. So how do we create AI systems that support decision-making that results in fair and equitable outcomes? So let’s define these concepts and give some instances to illustrate what we mean by them. 

Bias in computer vision

The word “bias” in computer vision refers to systematic mistakes or flaws in an algorithm’s predictions or results that lead to unjust treatment or unequal results for particular groups of persons or things. This can happen for a number of reasons, including unfair data-gathering methods, unbalanced training data, and algorithm design. Bias in computer vision systems can have negative effects, including the maintenance of societal injustices and the production of discriminating results in areas like facial recognition and object classification. To ensure that computer vision systems are just, accurate, and impartial, it is crucial to recognize and deal with prejudice. 

What is fairness?

Fairness in computer vision refers to making sure that an algorithm’s predictions or results are fair and unbiased and do not discriminate against particular categories of people or objects. Demographic fairness, which aims to ensure that the algorithm’s predictions are not biased against particular groups based on their demographic characteristics, and individual fairness, which aims to ensure that similar individuals receive similar predictions, are two different ways that fairness can be viewed. Fairness is an essential component of computer vision systems and is required to make sure that these systems are utilized morally and do not reinforce discrimination or inequities that already exist in society. 

The variance of fairness and bias

A systematic mistake or imbalance in a process, algorithm, or system is referred to as bias when it leads to unequal treatment or outcomes for particular groups of people or objects. Bias in computer vision can result in discriminating or unfair results in areas like facial recognition and object categorization due to imbalanced training data, algorithm design, or unethical data collection procedures. 

Contrarily, fairness refers to a system’s, algorithm’s, or process’s ability to treat all people or groups equally, impartially, and without bias. Fairness in computer vision refers to the idea that a computer vision algorithm’s predictions or results should be impartial and unbiased and should not be biased toward particular items or groups of individuals. 

Managing Fairness and Bias Problems in Computer Vision Systems

Computer vision systems may experience bias and fairness problems as a result of a variety of challenges, including unfair data-gathering methods, unbalanced training data, and algorithm design. There are a number of best practices and methods that can be used to resolve these problems: 

  1. Diversify training data:  

The computer vision system should be trained with a broad and representative dataset to assist minimize bias in the algorithm’s predictions. One of the major methods for minimizing bias in machine learning is to diversify the training data. To do this, a training dataset that reflects the variety of populations and traits the model is anticipated to face in real-world scenarios must be used. The chance of biased results is decreased by utilizing a varied and representative training dataset that allows the machine learning model to learn from a variety of examples and generalize more effectively to a larger range of inputs.

It is crucial to remember that if the training data is not varied and representative, simply having a big training dataset may not necessarily eliminate bias. For instance, the model may be biased towards one race and perform less accurately if the training data solely contains photographs of that race.

  2. Fair data collection:  

Make sure the data collection process is unbiased and fair. This entails taking into account elements like demographic representation and refraining from using skewed data sources. 

Another method to lessen bias in machine learning is fair data collecting. The data collection procedure directly affects the training data and, consequently, the predictions made by the machine learning model. It is crucial to take the important components into account to make sure that the data collection procedure is impartial.

  • Data source: The data source must accurately reflect the wide range of populations and traits that the model is anticipated to encounter in practical applications.
  • Data gathering procedure: Data collection procedures should be open, moral, and free from bias or discrimination. Biased training data may result, for instance, from the collection of data through targeted advertising or from only taking into account a particular group of people. 
  3. Algorithm Auditing:  

Perform regular method effectiveness audits to find and fix any potential fairness issues. A whole other strategy to decrease bias in machine learning is protocol monitoring. To find and correct any sources of bias, algorithm monitoring entails a methodical and in-depth analysis of the machine learning model and its predictions. This can be accomplished using a variety of methods, including:

  • Fairness metrics: Using fairness metrics to assess how fairly the model’s predictions are made, such as demographic parity, equal opportunity, and predictive parity. 
  • Counterfactual analysis: Investigating the model’s predictions under various circumstances, such as switching a person’s ethnicity or gender from the input data, to find any biases.
  • Review by experts:

A panel of experts should examine the model’s predictions and algorithms to look for any bias or discriminatory results. 

  4. Fairness metrics:

 Make use of fairness metrics to assess the effectiveness of the computer vision system and make sure it is not prejudiced against any particular racial or ethnic group.  

To assess the fairness of a machine learning model’s predictions, fairness metrics are a tool used in algorithm audits. These metrics offer a numerical evaluation of fairness and aid in locating any biases present in the model. Some typical fairness metrics are:

  • Demographic Parity: This indicator assesses whether the predictions of the model are equally plausible for various groups of people, such as those classified by race or gender. 
  • Equal Opportunity: Regardless of the outcome being predicted, this statistic assesses whether the model’s predictions are equally accurate for all groups of people. 
  • Predictive Parity: Predictive Parity is a metric that assesses whether predictions made by a model are equally accurate for people who have comparable traits, independent of the group to which they belon
  5. Explainability:

To promote responsibility and trust in the system, give clear justifications for the algorithm’s choices.

Make the forecasts and decision-making process of the model more transparent and understandable to eliminate bias in machine learning. Explainability is to give a brief and understandable explanation of how the model arrived at its predictions and the rationale behind certain actions. This can assist in understanding the model’s prediction process and locating any sources of bias inside the model. 

To accomplish explainability in machine learning, a variety of strategies are utilized, such as: 

  • Feature importance: This method gives a measurement of the significance of each feature in the input data for the predictions made by the model.
  • Model inspection: This method entails looking at the model’s inputs and outputs to determine how the model makes predictions.
  • LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations): This technique, known as LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations), creates explanations for particular predictions by fitting a local model around the prediction and then explaining the prediction in terms of the local model. 
  • SHAP (Shapley Additive ExPlanation): 

The SHAP (Shapley Additive ExPlanations) technique uses the Shapley value, a measurement of the contribution of each feature to the prediction, to explain certain prediction.

  6. Continuous development:

Review and update the computer vision system on a regular basis to fix any new fairness problems that might appear as time passes.

Another method for reducing bias in machine learning is continuous development, which makes sure that the model is continuously refined and updated. In order to lessen any sources of bias, this requires continually checking the model’s performance and upgrading the model as necessary with fresh data and methodologies.

The problem of model drift, which happens when the performance of the model varies over time as the data and the environment it is operating in change, is helped by continuous development. Drift can be identified and corrected by regularly monitoring and updating the model, which lowers the possibility of biased results.

For the people in charge of creating, deploying, and utilizing the machine learning model, continuous development also includes continuing training and education. 

  7. Regular monitoring and evaluation: 

 Regular performance monitoring and evaluation are necessary to spot any new problems and guarantee that the computer vision system will continue to function fairly over time.

An even more option to eliminate bias in machine learning is regular monitoring and review. This entails frequently assessing the model’s performance to make sure it is operating as planned and generating accurate forecasts. 

Regular monitoring and assessment might include a variety of tasks, including:

  • Performance metrics: Measuring the model’s performance on a particular task or collection of tasks on a regular basis will allow you to check if it is operating as planned and spot any variations in performance over time. 
  • Bias monitoring:  Monitoring for bias involves keeping an eye on the model’s predictions to look for any potential sources of bias, such as group or demographic bias, and to make sure they are accurate and impartial.
  • Feedback from users: Gather comments from those who have used the model in order to comprehend their experiences and spot any biases in the predictions made by the model.
  • Fairness metrics: Consistently assess the model’s predictions using fairness metrics in order to identify and correct any biases.

By continuously observing and assessing the model, bias sources may be found and eliminated, and the model’s performance can be improved over time. This reduces the possibility of biased results and ensures the model is used ethically and fairly.

  8.  Collaboration with diverse communities: 

 In order to ensure that their perspectives and needs are taken into account during the design and implementation of the system, collaborate with diverse communities, including those that may be marginalized or disproportionately affected by bias in computer vision systems. 

Another key strategy to lessen bias in machine learning is a collaboration with different communities. Guarantee that the model is being developed and used in an ethical and equitable manner, this entails collaborating with a wide range of stakeholders, including members of underrepresented populations.

Working with diverse groups enables machine learning practitioners to better understand the issues and biases that people confront in the real world and incorporate these insights into the model’s development. This can assist in minimizing the model’s sources of bias and ensuring that the model is delivering accurate and impartial predictions.

Collaboration with diverse groups can also help to improve the machine’s accountability and transparency.

  9. Interdisciplinary approach:  

 Using knowledge and skills from disciplines like ethics, computer science, and sociology, take an interdisciplinary approach to tackle bias and fairness issues in computer vision systems.

Another method to lessen bias in machine learning is to take an interdisciplinary approach. Building and applying machine learning models entails bringing together people with various backgrounds and specialties, including computer science, statistics, ethics, law, and the social sciences. 

By including a wider range of viewpoints and skills in the model construction process, an interdisciplinary approach helps to solve the problem of bias in machine learning. Individuals from the social sciences, for instance, can assist in locating and addressing sources of bias in the data and the model’s predictions, while those with expertise in ethics can guarantee that the model is being created and applied in a fair and ethical manner

  10. Transparency: 

 To foster trust and accountability as well as to enable unbiased evaluation and verification of the computer vision system’s fairness, be honest about the data, algorithms, and procedures employed in the system.

A different technique to mitigate bias in pattern recognition is transparency. In order for stakeholders to understand how the model functions and how its predictions are created, transparency refers to the openness and visibility of the model’s decisions, forecasts, and procedures. 

For a number of reasons, machine learning transparency is crucial

  • Bias detection: Stakeholders are better able to recognize and detect sources of bias in the model’s predictions by understanding the model’s methods and outputs.
  • Trust and accountability: Transparency can assist build stakeholder trust in the model and its predictions by allowing them to see how and why the model makes its predictions. As stakeholders can comprehend how the model is being utilized and what influence it has, this can help raise the model’s accountability.
  11.  Regular retraining and updating:  

To keep the computer vision system accurate and fair over time, it must be routinely retrained and updated with fresh, unbiased data. 

The last solution to avoid bias in cognitive computing is routine retraining and updating. In order to maintain the model’s accuracy, fairness, and currentness, this entails continuously training the model on fresh and updated data as well as modifying the model’s parameters and algorithms over time. 

The model has to be retrained and updated for a number of reasons: 

  • Reducing bias: The model can gradually learn to eliminate sources of bias and increase its accuracy by being trained repeatedly on fresh and updated data. 
  • Reflecting changes in the real world: Real-world changes are reflected in the model by routine retraining and updating, which also helps to maintain the model’s applicability and accuracy. 
  • Improving model performance: Retraining and updating on a regular basis can help the model perform better and make fewer mistakes over time.
  12.  Awareness and education:

Increase understanding and support for initiatives to address these challenges by raising awareness and educating people about bias and fairness issues in computer vision systems, both within the computer vision community and among the general public. 

An even worse tactic to alleviate bias in deep is to increase awareness and education. This entails improving awareness of the potential causes of bias as well as the significance of fairness and ethical considerations among those responsible for the creation and use of algorithms for machine learning. 

Education and awareness are crucial for a number of reasons:

  • Enhancing model development: People involved in the process can make better decisions and create models that are more accurate and fair by raising their knowledge of the various sources of bias. 
  • Promoting ethical and responsible use: People who are utilizing or depending on machine learning models for decision-making might be encouraged to do so by awareness and education.
  • Increasing transparency: Raising people’s awareness and encouraging them to ask questions can also promote openness.

 These actions can aid in improving fairness and lowering bias in computer vision systems. To make sure that the system stays impartial and fair throughout time, it is crucial to regularly review and improve it. 


As the usage of computer vision technology grows more prevalent and significant, it is probable that ongoing research and development will be conducted in the field of addressing bias and fairness issues in computer vision systems. 

 In the near future, a number of trends are anticipated to materialize, including: 

Increased use of explainable AI (XAI) and interpretable machine learning techniques:  

XAI and interpretable machine learning techniques seek to increase the transparency and understandability of the judgments and predictions made by computer vision models, reducing sources of bias and enhancing fairness. 

Creation of new fairness measures: 

 As computer vision systems are used more frequently, new and better fairness metrics will probably be created, enabling a more in-depth and thorough knowledge of fairness in these systems. 

Greater cooperation amongst stakeholders: 

 To solve bias and fairness issues in computer vision systems, researchers, policymakers, businesses, and civil society will probably work together more to create and put into practice efficient solutions. 

Integrating ethical considerations throughout the development process: 

 As the value of fairness and ethics in computer vision systems continues to be recognized, it is likely that these considerations will be incorporated more and more throughout the development process, from the choice of training data to the deployment of models. 

In the final result, it is anticipated that there will be more collaboration and incorporation of ethical considerations into the development process, as well as continuous research and development in the field of addressing bias and fairness issues in computer vision systems.


In conclusion, prejudice and fairness are crucial factors to take into account while creating and utilizing computer vision systems. Due to the constraints of the training data and the algorithms employed, these systems are vulnerable to biases, and it is crucial to overcome these biases in order to make sure that they are impartial and accurate. 

 Diversifying training data, fair data collection, algorithm auditing, fairness metrics, explainability, continuous development, regular monitoring and evaluation, collaboration with diverse communities, interdisciplinary approach, transparency, regular retraining and updating, awareness, and education are some methods that can be used to reduce bias in computer vision systems. 

 It is anticipated that more research and development will be done in this field in the future, as well as more attention will be paid to dealing with bias and fairness problems in computer vision systems. 

Who Are We?

Apture is a no-code computer vision deployment platform that allows the integration of AI-based algorithms to improve monitoring, inspections, and automated analysis throughout a workplace in multiple industries. Our core focus remains on improving the safety, security, and productivity of an environment through computer vision. We offer products in multiple categories such as EHS, security, inspections, expressions, etc. that can be leveraged by businesses in a variety of industries to stay compliant, and safe and increase ROI with AI. Have a look at our platform and get a free trial today. 

Get Subscribed to our Newsletter to stay on top of recent CV developments!

Related Articles

The only platform you need to implement CV without the hassle.

A Context based CV deployment platform. Build Intelligence into your Cameras with Machine Learning. Derive insights from your visual data to drive growth.

Contact Info

Subscribe Now

Don’t miss our future updates! Get Subscribed Today!